<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gmail security breach</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/10/29/gmail-security-breach/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/10/29/gmail-security-breach/</link>
	<description>entertaining hundreds of millions of eyeball atoms every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat,  9 Jul 2011 14:30:28 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/10/29/gmail-security-breach/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2004 14:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=135#comment-25</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been corrected - the gmail authentication cookie is not the lifetime persistent Google cookie. However, I think this is a fairly serious issue and a good warning about the fragility of the security of web systems. Even though this exploit has been addressed since the announcement, it&#039;s worth highlighting that any cookie that&#039;s stored on disk is probably fairly easily stolen. I would NOT be surprised to see this be the target of a worm in the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been corrected &#8211; the gmail authentication cookie is not the lifetime persistent Google cookie. However, I think this is a fairly serious issue and a good warning about the fragility of the security of web systems. Even though this exploit has been addressed since the announcement, it&#8217;s worth highlighting that any cookie that&#8217;s stored on disk is probably fairly easily stolen. I would NOT be surprised to see this be the target of a worm in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guido</title>
		<link>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/10/29/gmail-security-breach/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Guido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2004 14:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=135#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Fortunately, the security flaw seems to have been fixed by now:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/11/01/gmail_bug_fixed/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fortunately, the security flaw seems to have been fixed by now:<br />
<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/11/01/gmail_bug_fixed/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/11/01/gmail_bug_fixed/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Fajardo</title>
		<link>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/10/29/gmail-security-breach/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Fajardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2004 14:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=135#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I was concerned about this when I read about it.  However it seems that Google has patched the problem:

http://www.macworld.com/news/2004/11/01/gmail/index.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was concerned about this when I read about it.  However it seems that Google has patched the problem:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.macworld.com/news/2004/11/01/gmail/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.macworld.com/news/2004/11/01/gmail/index.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

