<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on questions every high school student should be able to answer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/04/25/thoughts-on-questions-every-high-school-student-should-be-able-to-answer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/04/25/thoughts-on-questions-every-high-school-student-should-be-able-to-answer/</link>
	<description>entertaining hundreds of millions of eyeball atoms every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat,  9 Jul 2011 14:30:28 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Dominus</title>
		<link>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/04/25/thoughts-on-questions-every-high-school-student-should-be-able-to-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dominus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/04/25/thoughts-on-questions-every-high-school-student-should-be-able-to-answer/#comment-705</guid>
		<description>I think that the very fine distinction you have drawn here between &quot;choose&quot; and &quot;select&quot; is not supported by standard or common usage.  For example, the OED defines &quot;choose&quot; as:

    To take by preference out of all that are available; to select.

and &quot;select&quot; as:

    To choose or pick out in preference to another or others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the very fine distinction you have drawn here between &#8220;choose&#8221; and &#8220;select&#8221; is not supported by standard or common usage.  For example, the OED defines &#8220;choose&#8221; as:</p>
<p>    To take by preference out of all that are available; to select.</p>
<p>and &#8220;select&#8221; as:</p>
<p>    To choose or pick out in preference to another or others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/04/25/thoughts-on-questions-every-high-school-student-should-be-able-to-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-704</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 02:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/04/25/thoughts-on-questions-every-high-school-student-should-be-able-to-answer/#comment-704</guid>
		<description>But &quot;choose&quot; and &quot;select&quot; aren&#039;t identical terms. At least according to the nuances of the term as I know it, &quot;choose&quot; definitely implies thought, where &quot;select&quot; may be something that just happens.

It&#039;s a minor point amidst all of the other failings of the piece, but I think it casts some more light on the distinction you made - some of those questions are merely posing as science, and that&#039;s a looming threat to actual science. Choosing terms in that debate is important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But &#8220;choose&#8221; and &#8220;select&#8221; aren&#8217;t identical terms. At least according to the nuances of the term as I know it, &#8220;choose&#8221; definitely implies thought, where &#8220;select&#8221; may be something that just happens.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a minor point amidst all of the other failings of the piece, but I think it casts some more light on the distinction you made &#8211; some of those questions are merely posing as science, and that&#8217;s a looming threat to actual science. Choosing terms in that debate is important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Dominus</title>
		<link>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/04/25/thoughts-on-questions-every-high-school-student-should-be-able-to-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-703</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dominus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 02:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/04/25/thoughts-on-questions-every-high-school-student-should-be-able-to-answer/#comment-703</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your kind words.  Your remark about how &quot;evolution doesn&#039;t actually &#039;choose&#039; anything&quot; seems to refer to the sentence
&quot;Darwin&#039;s theory of species origination says that natural selection chooses organisms  that...&quot; from the original article.

But I don&#039;t think your objection makes sense.  You are objecting specifically to the word &quot;chooses&quot;, saying that natural selection doesn&#039;t &quot;choose&quot; anything.  If this is a substantive complaint, then it shouldn&#039;t evaporate when we replace &quot;choose&quot; with a synonym.  Hmm, where&#039;s my thesaurus?  How about &quot;select&quot;?  Adam Fields says that &quot;natural selection doesn&#039;t actually select anything.&quot;

Well, okay.  But if it&#039;s true, whose fault is it?

Maybe I&#039;ve missed your point.  What&#039;s your objection again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your kind words.  Your remark about how &#8220;evolution doesn&#8217;t actually &#8216;choose&#8217; anything&#8221; seems to refer to the sentence<br />
&#8220;Darwin&#8217;s theory of species origination says that natural selection chooses organisms  that&#8230;&#8221; from the original article.</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t think your objection makes sense.  You are objecting specifically to the word &#8220;chooses&#8221;, saying that natural selection doesn&#8217;t &#8220;choose&#8221; anything.  If this is a substantive complaint, then it shouldn&#8217;t evaporate when we replace &#8220;choose&#8221; with a synonym.  Hmm, where&#8217;s my thesaurus?  How about &#8220;select&#8221;?  Adam Fields says that &#8220;natural selection doesn&#8217;t actually select anything.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, okay.  But if it&#8217;s true, whose fault is it?</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;ve missed your point.  What&#8217;s your objection again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

