<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The state of Adobe RAW processing for the Canon 400D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/09/27/the-state-of-adobe-raw-processing-for-the-canon-400d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/09/27/the-state-of-adobe-raw-processing-for-the-canon-400d/</link>
	<description>entertaining hundreds of millions of eyeball atoms every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat,  9 Jul 2011 14:30:28 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/09/27/the-state-of-adobe-raw-processing-for-the-canon-400d/comment-page-1/#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/09/27/the-state-of-adobe-raw-processing-for-the-canon-400d/#comment-760</guid>
		<description>Hey... Canon released the 400D a full month earlier than they said they would, and the software hasn&#039;t caught up yet. I&#039;m not going to complain too hard. :)

Actually, it seems that Lightroom 4 beta will convert to DNG, but I don&#039;t think the Canon DPP software will.

DNG is interesting to me, but I think it would be more practical if it was output by the cameras directly. I haven&#039;t been keeping extra copies of my RAW files in DNG, although I&#039;ll probably go back and convert all of my Digital Rebel and XT RAW files once I get some kind of high capacity recordable disc technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey&#8230; Canon released the 400D a full month earlier than they said they would, and the software hasn&#8217;t caught up yet. I&#8217;m not going to complain too hard. <img src='http://www.aquick.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Actually, it seems that Lightroom 4 beta will convert to DNG, but I don&#8217;t think the Canon DPP software will.</p>
<p>DNG is interesting to me, but I think it would be more practical if it was output by the cameras directly. I haven&#8217;t been keeping extra copies of my RAW files in DNG, although I&#8217;ll probably go back and convert all of my Digital Rebel and XT RAW files once I get some kind of high capacity recordable disc technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hodgkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/09/27/the-state-of-adobe-raw-processing-for-the-canon-400d/comment-page-1/#comment-759</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hodgkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/09/27/the-state-of-adobe-raw-processing-for-the-canon-400d/#comment-759</guid>
		<description>Hm, the emoticon got stripped from that last comment, sorry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, the emoticon got stripped from that last comment, sorry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hodgkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/09/27/the-state-of-adobe-raw-processing-for-the-canon-400d/comment-page-1/#comment-758</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hodgkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/09/27/the-state-of-adobe-raw-processing-for-the-canon-400d/#comment-758</guid>
		<description>Can you not bulk convert to an agnostic format like DNG?

Or get a camera with decent support like Nikon?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you not bulk convert to an agnostic format like DNG?</p>
<p>Or get a camera with decent support like Nikon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

