Comments on: It is time for the distinction between Mac software and PC software to go away http://www.aquick.org/blog/2007/02/21/it-is-time-for-the-distinction-between-mac-software-and-pc-software-to-go-away/ entertaining hundreds of millions of eyeball atoms every day Sat, 9 Jul 2011 14:30:28 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: John Beardsworth http://www.aquick.org/blog/2007/02/21/it-is-time-for-the-distinction-between-mac-software-and-pc-software-to-go-away/comment-page-1/#comment-772 John Beardsworth Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:08:51 +0000 http://www.aquick.org/blog/2007/02/21/it-is-time-for-the-distinction-between-mac-software-and-pc-software-to-go-away/#comment-772 Couldn't agree more - like you a Mac laptop and Windows desktop here. If I can run software on 2 machines, it's no-one's business what brand they happen to be. The example of Lightroom, with a cross platform licence, at least gives one hope for CS3. Couldn’t agree more – like you a Mac laptop and Windows desktop here. If I can run software on 2 machines, it’s no-one’s business what brand they happen to be. The example of Lightroom, with a cross platform licence, at least gives one hope for CS3.

]]> By: adam http://www.aquick.org/blog/2007/02/21/it-is-time-for-the-distinction-between-mac-software-and-pc-software-to-go-away/comment-page-1/#comment-771 adam Thu, 22 Feb 2007 02:49:32 +0000 http://www.aquick.org/blog/2007/02/21/it-is-time-for-the-distinction-between-mac-software-and-pc-software-to-go-away/#comment-771 I don't see what difference that makes. Companies aren't constantly switching back and forth - and they'd still need a valid license for each machine. This is a simpler problem - why am I forced to run the Windows version of CS3 on my Mac using virtualization software, taking up far more RAM and CPU resources than needed for the native version, when it wouldn't hurt Adobe any to let me run the native version instead? This is my point - I already <em>have</em> the license. My assertion is that the fact that it's for a different OS should be moot. I'm not asking Adobe to do any extra work, the Mac version already exists. Just let me run it with my existing license! I don’t see what difference that makes. Companies aren’t constantly switching back and forth – and they’d still need a valid license for each machine.

This is a simpler problem – why am I forced to run the Windows version of CS3 on my Mac using virtualization software, taking up far more RAM and CPU resources than needed for the native version, when it wouldn’t hurt Adobe any to let me run the native version instead?

This is my point – I already have the license. My assertion is that the fact that it’s for a different OS should be moot. I’m not asking Adobe to do any extra work, the Mac version already exists. Just let me run it with my existing license!

]]> By: Scott Wickham http://www.aquick.org/blog/2007/02/21/it-is-time-for-the-distinction-between-mac-software-and-pc-software-to-go-away/comment-page-1/#comment-770 Scott Wickham Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:26:48 +0000 http://www.aquick.org/blog/2007/02/21/it-is-time-for-the-distinction-between-mac-software-and-pc-software-to-go-away/#comment-770 The reason they do it is because, companies buy $1,000 software. The reason they do it is because, companies buy $1,000 software.

]]>